Rendered at 03:37:29 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
nielsbot 23 hours ago [-]
FTA:
> “I work with Flock Safety. And I called originally because I’m getting followed,” the installer can be heard telling a dispatcher in the recording of the call obtained by Atlanta News First Investigates. “I was getting harassed, pretty much. Taking videos and pictures. And now, the same vehicle that pulled over where I was working at has been following me.”
…the irony
nielsbot 22 hours ago [-]
I like to ask people who are pro blanket surveillance if they’d be ok with the police putting an Air Tag in their car
jqpabc123 1 days ago [-]
So they can film you but you can't film them?
Double standard much?
0utcast 1 days ago [-]
Yep they hate having a camera in their face, how ironic
kotaKat 18 hours ago [-]
> “Why can’t the person opt out? It’s because if your car gets stolen, if something were to happen, moreover, the government requires you to have a license plate. It’s the law. And it’s plain view information,” [Flock Safety’s Chief Communications Officer Josh ] Thomas said. “Your license plate is part of the plain view. And so why can’t you opt out. You can, if you want to opt out of society.”
Unless you're part of the Karen HOAs that buy them - then you can be part of the community SafeList!
I despise Flock. Have had plenty to say. But I suspect -this- was the reason, moreso than the filming the installation:
> As Keefe began to shoot video, the installer saw him and immediately packed up his equipment and drove away, so Keefe also returned to his car and followed several cars behind, hoping to document the next stop.
Not to say the installer wouldn't have anyway, but it's not inherently unreasonable to call 911 when someone is obviously following you.
ButlerianJihad 1 days ago [-]
> call 911
It is unreasonable, because 911 is for emergencies where life or property is imminently threatened.
If you believe someone is watching and following you, then you can call the non-emergency number. Or your mom.
andrewflnr 24 hours ago [-]
So you have to look up the non-emergency number while someone may or may not be getting in position to do you physical harm. Even if we hate Flock as a company, that individual very much knows we hate Flock, and has reason to fear for his safety.
Edit: and then the cops just talked to the guy doing the following and didn't arrest him or anything. The 911 call is almost a non-story. It's not even a microcosm of the actual problem with Flock and, let's not forget, its copycats.
1659447091 1 days ago [-]
> If you believe someone is watching and following you, then you can call the non-emergency number.
They can also drive to a police/fire station
cpburns2009 1 days ago [-]
This is actually something I've wondered about. What is the non-emergency number?
dghlsakjg 1 days ago [-]
It’s just a regular phone number, so it depends what department you are trying to call. Google or a phone book is what you need.
dlcarrier 22 hours ago [-]
It's usually on the web page of the local police or sheriff department.
ninju 1 days ago [-]
You might have to google it because it's not standardized across the country
I had no idea 311 existed. If I'm honest, I had no idea there was any three digit shortcut aside from 911. Although now that I think of it, I may have seen signs near buried utilities saying to call 811 before digging. Interesting.
ButlerianJihad 23 hours ago [-]
311 does not reach law enforcement. 311 is the number to complain about code violations or request routine maintenance from the municipal government. The types of requests that go through City Hall during office hours.
1659447091 23 hours ago [-]
They can give the location of the nearest police or fire station, for some non-emergancy law enforcement issues they will put you through to the county sheriff. Had a friend call over a property dispute with their roommate and they got and sent a sheriff over (within a city that had its own municipal police force)
FireBeyond 23 hours ago [-]
The one thing you can do is call 911 and when they respond, just say "I need the non-emergency line" and they'll usually transfer you immediately or just check quickly with you. Just don't waffle on.
JohnFen 7 hours ago [-]
In my state, doing this is a class A misdemeanor with a maximum sentence of a year in jail and a fine of about $6,000.
They probably wouldn't (but certainly could) charge you with it if you just do it once or without warning you, but still, it's an obvious abuse of the 911 system.
dghlsakjg 11 hours ago [-]
Please don’t tie up emergency dispatchers by using them like a receptionist.
You can just google the number.
doubleg72 55 minutes ago [-]
It's the same people as non emergency line
FireBeyond 23 hours ago [-]
I was a paramedic/firefighter for 14 years. I think while there's merit in calling out people jumping at shadows, I do get how this situation, stupidly, escalated.
And there's a bit more to EMS than "imminent life threats only".
dlcarrier 22 hours ago [-]
Property damage is often explicitly listed by municipalities as a reason to call 911. They might not care in New York or San Francisco, but in most small towns they usually try to catch vandals in the act.
> “I work with Flock Safety. And I called originally because I’m getting followed,” the installer can be heard telling a dispatcher in the recording of the call obtained by Atlanta News First Investigates. “I was getting harassed, pretty much. Taking videos and pictures. And now, the same vehicle that pulled over where I was working at has been following me.”
…the irony
Double standard much?
Unless you're part of the Karen HOAs that buy them - then you can be part of the community SafeList!
https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/how-the-safe-list-solves-pr...
> As Keefe began to shoot video, the installer saw him and immediately packed up his equipment and drove away, so Keefe also returned to his car and followed several cars behind, hoping to document the next stop.
Not to say the installer wouldn't have anyway, but it's not inherently unreasonable to call 911 when someone is obviously following you.
It is unreasonable, because 911 is for emergencies where life or property is imminently threatened.
If you believe someone is watching and following you, then you can call the non-emergency number. Or your mom.
Edit: and then the cops just talked to the guy doing the following and didn't arrest him or anything. The 911 call is almost a non-story. It's not even a microcosm of the actual problem with Flock and, let's not forget, its copycats.
They can also drive to a police/fire station
https://www.google.com/search?q=police+non+emergency+number+...
https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/nationally-assigned-3-d...
They probably wouldn't (but certainly could) charge you with it if you just do it once or without warning you, but still, it's an obvious abuse of the 911 system.
You can just google the number.
And there's a bit more to EMS than "imminent life threats only".